In 2003, the prime minister and the provincial premiers agreed upon priority areas for reinvestment. The 2003 First Ministers’ Accord on Health Care Renewal reaffirmed their commitment to the principles of the Canada Health Act. They indicated the following principles:
“Drawing from this foundation, First Ministers view this Accord as a covenant which will help to ensure that:
- all Canadians have timely access to health services on the basis of need, not ability to pay, regardless of where they live or move in Canada;
- the health care services available to Canadians are of high quality, effective, patient-centred and safe; and
- our health care system is sustainable and affordable and will be here for Canadians and their children in the future.”
The accord set the following priority areas: primary health care, home care, catastrophic drug coverage, access to diagnostic/medical equipment and information technology and an electronic health record.
Isn’t that the idea? To work toward those goals? I’m not a political genius, but I’m pretty sure that is what President Obama is driving. The process to get there will be very challenging. The system will not be perfect…ever. But if it helps to create a healthy population…for all Americans…then there is no doubt that it will have a positive impact on the health of the American economy over decades. A healthy, educated child becomes a healthy, educated adult. And that builds a healthy, educated middle class, which creates small business, fosters entrepreneurship, and leads the health of our economy.
(Taking a breath…) OK. That is health care and my two cents (cha-ching…4 Republican readers have just unsubscribed…and cha-ching…5 Democrat readers have just subscribed).


Single payer is the best way to go, I agree completely. Why they didn’t start the reform process with something simple, like “Medicare for All” is a complete mystery. John Conyers (D-Mich) introduced a bill that would have done that — HR 676, I think. It was only 30 pages long and even a non-lawyer could understand it — imagine! Instead, we get 1,200+ pages of legalese that won’t kick in until 2013 (or possibly never, if the insurance industry execs and certain other people have their way), won’t cover everyone and may or may not have a public option. Thanks for nothing, Congress!
Right on, Janet! The Canadian model, however imperfect, is as good as it gets.
I wonder what people would really think if the media didn’t stir up the fear factors and if the political parties weren’t so polarized. I like MoneyPenny’s point that had the reform been labelled something really simple (she coins “Medicare for All”…I would buy that…”healthcare for all” works!) people would understand the concept better. Now I have to do my research on HR 676.
Marika — I agree. And I wish more people would just say it like it is! How can anyone NOT want healthcare for all??
[...] Single payer, public option, 5 bills into one…Janet at Gen Plus gives her American/Canadian take on last week’s day in healthcare history. [...]
If we could keep the concept of communism and socialism OUT of the mix we might be able to understand that it is really what our country was founded upon. Looking back at history, the founding fathers didn’t like the concept of large banks and more or less predicted what has happened. While a banking system much larger than they could have concieved is necessary for a free economy, they still had the right idea. The fact that most insurance companies have ties to large banking should tell us something.
The insurance companies and banks are holding our health and welfare hostage. Let our governments get our healthcare under control and we will be healthy enough to wrest the control of our financial lives from the clutches of big business!
Suzanne, you are so right. How did fear-mongering become so mighty as to usurp the goals and aspirations for our people? I wrote a post awhile back talking about our founding fathers and got a bit of a tongue lashing: http://www.genplususa.com/what-would-our-founding-fathers-say/
Thanks for throwing in your two cents. I couldn’t agree with you more.